Chris Drew: Difference between revisions

From The Chicago Hip-Hop History Project
(Created page with "'''Chris Drew'''")
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Chris Drew'''
[[File:Harold Washington and Chris Drew Frame.jpg|200px|thumb|right|Memorial]]
'''Chris Drew''' (1950-May 7, 2012)<ref>https://truthout.org/articles/remembering-chris-drew-chicago-free-speech-artist-and-civil-rights-activist/</ref> is an street artist and activist from Chicago, Illinois.
 
'''Drew’s''' cause had been what he believed was the constitutional right of artists to sell their work in public, wherever they wish, as long as they’re not blocking the right-of-way.
 
'''Drew''' was arrested for selling his art in public on December 2, 2009. Upon finding a recording device on his person, the police tacked on a felony eavesdropping charge for illegally recording his arrest without telling the officers. His case was taken to the state's highest court where it was pending when '''Drew''' died of cancer in 2012. Following '''Drew's''' death, the Supreme Court ruled, on two other cases, that the eavesdropping law unconstitutional.<ref>https://chicagoreader.com/columns-opinion/what-will-be-the-legacy-of-street-artist-chris-drew/</ref>
 
[[Category:Knowledge]]
[[Category:Graffiti Artists]]

Latest revision as of 10:22, 18 September 2025

Memorial

Chris Drew (1950-May 7, 2012)[1] is an street artist and activist from Chicago, Illinois.

Drew’s cause had been what he believed was the constitutional right of artists to sell their work in public, wherever they wish, as long as they’re not blocking the right-of-way.

Drew was arrested for selling his art in public on December 2, 2009. Upon finding a recording device on his person, the police tacked on a felony eavesdropping charge for illegally recording his arrest without telling the officers. His case was taken to the state's highest court where it was pending when Drew died of cancer in 2012. Following Drew's death, the Supreme Court ruled, on two other cases, that the eavesdropping law unconstitutional.[2]